"mehma sarja" <mehmasarja AT gmail DOT com> kirjoitti viestissä
news:ec5d34681001250830h9cfb180naea17beb1a5444d0 AT mail.gmail DOT com...
> Timo,.
>
>Your test involved just 600 some MB of data which may not be a large or
>varied enough data set. There is data and then there is data. Millions of
>small email index files is harder on Bacula than thousands of large files.
>And you don't mentioned if or how you controlled for your network
>bandwidth - did you keep all traffic off it?
>
> I'd suggest you use a data set which is typical of your intended use and
> multiply it by a factor of 10 and keep bandwidth stable.

Network load definetely wasn't the reason here, hard to document it, but I 
just know it. Also, the results were very repeatable when I run the same 
test several times, this doesn't sound like a network load problem either.

But yes, I'll need to re-run the test with another type of data. A lot of 
small files will cause plenty of overhead. I just didn't think it would be 
that much overhead...

--
Timo 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users