Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula - ESXi - vmdk hot backup

2010-01-21 10:56:17
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula - ESXi - vmdk hot backup
From: Carlo Filippetto <carlo.filippetto AT gmail DOT com>
To: Josh Fisher <jfisher AT pvct DOT com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:53:22 +0100
I've got the VM backup, but I need more velocity when I restore the machine..
I have 3 ESXi in separate city, obviusly without HA, and a bacula
server in every place..




2010/1/21 Josh Fisher <jfisher AT pvct DOT com>:
> I think there are two schools of thought.
>
> 1. Run FD on the host and backup a snapshot of the running VM's storage.
> 2. Run FD in the VM and backup as any other machine.
>
> The advantages of 1 are simpler backup and faster, simpler restore in a
> disaster recovery situation. The disadvantages of 1 are that it uses
> more backup storage and there isn't any way to restore individual files
> to the VM.
>
> The advantages of 2 are smaller overall backup storage requirements and
> the possibility to restore individual files to a running VM. The
> disadvantage is a more complex disaster recovery procedure.
>
> My current strategy with Linux KVM VMs is to run FD in the VMs. On the
> host machine, I keep an image that is essentially a bootable rescue disk
> that contains bacula-fd and a minimal install of the same OS the VMs
> run. The rescue disk image gets backed up with the host machine. The
> rescue image is only needed for disaster recovery. Restoring individual
> files to the running VM is exactly the same as restoring to a real
> machine. For disaster recovery, I dd the rescue image to the VM's boot
> storage, then boot the VM and do a full restore in like manner to
> restoring a real machine. I believe this method is more flexible for
> general use, and the more complex disaster recovery is not overly
> troublesome.
>
> However, it depends on your needs. If fast disaster recovery is more
> important than the ability to restore individual files, or because there
> are a lot of VMs, then method 1 might be more appropriate. In my case,
> the VMs run on a two-node HA cluster, and so the death of one node
> machine would not affect the VMs at all, thus the ability to restore
> individual files on the VM is more important. YMMV.
>
>
> Carlo Filippetto wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I would like to backup my virtual machine VMDK on ESXi 3.5
>> There's a way to do it with the machine on and I have a consistent bck?
>> What kind of change I have to do?
>>
>> Otherwise.. I can make a hot clone of my VM and backup it?
>>
>> Thank's
>>
>> CIAO
>> Carlo
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the
> world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference
> attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through
> interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the
world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference
attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through
interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>