On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Kevin Keane<subscription AT kkeane DOT com> 
wrote:
> Daniel De Marco wrote:
>> * Kevin Keane <subscription AT kkeane DOT com> [07/28/2009 21:51]:
>>
>>> I didn't follow this thread, but there is a simple solution to this
>>> problem. You can generate the actual content of the file set with a
>>> script, and call the same script from within both file sets in the
>>> bacula configuration file.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, but in this case then the fileset would be the same and it would
>> not solve the original problem. no?
>>
> As I said, I didn't follow the whole thread, so I don't really know what
> the whole goal was. What I saw was that apparently you wanted to have
> two separate file sets (with different names, obviously) that both
> contain the exact same files - and needed a way to maintain it that way.
> Basically, you would end up with two DIFFERENT filesets that just happen
> to be exactly identical to each other. If I misunderstood that, I
> apologize. Then my suggestion really isn't useful.
>

The goal was to allow an a local and off-site backups of the same
fileset to be independent. I remember that I did this in the past
(years ago) that this worked if you created 2 jobs that contained the
same fileset. Apparently in bacula 3.0.X this no longer works, so the
need was to now create 2 jobs and 2 filesets. But the OP did not want
the chance of the filesets to differ between the two jobs..


John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users