> Inno,
> If files are all different, and you modify 10GB every day keeping the 600
> total, I think (pretty sure) that yes, on the 4th you'll have the original
> 600GB plus the 40GB differences.
> That with incrementals.
>
> With fulls every day, you'll have just 600GB every day, total on the pool
> (we are not minding about compression), after the cleanup.
>
> (Really hope Les don't mind me saying what he said with other words. I'm
> taking the chance to think loud with Inno.)
>
> But fulls are slower, even with rsync. That also means that with tar or
> samba are even slower. You know why?
> I'm going to go through
http://www.samba.org/rsync/documentation.html.
> Something scared me first time, and I didn't return.
>
> Thanks, Les
>
> Regards
> Luis
>
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Inno <
innop AT voila DOT fr> wrote:
>
> > But if I have many data : 600 GB for a full and 10 GB modify by day. An
> > incremental it's better ? Because if I have a differential backup I have 10
> > GB the first day, 20 GB the second day... 40 GB the fourth day... ... no ?
> >
> > M T W T F S S <- Day
> > I I I I F - - <- Backup
> > 1 2 3 4 0 - - <- Level
> > 10 20 30 40 600 <- GB
> >
> >
>