Re: [BackupPC-users] Sending csums, cnt = 0, phase = 1 - Backups stuck!
2009-04-09 11:44:11
Hi,
Boniforti Flavio wrote on 2009-04-09 15:50:45 +0200 [Re: [BackupPC-users]
Sending csums, cnt = 0, phase = 1 - Backups stuck!]:
>
> Therefore we should pray to get File::RsyncP which supports protocol
> version 30 asap, right?
well, that's what Jeffrey's doing :-).
> > Remind me, please, which version of BackupPC and File::RsyncP
> > you are running and what your XferLogLevel is set to. If
>
> I'm using BackupPC 3.1.0-6 (on Debian testing) but don't know how to
> check File::RsyncP version. I just see this:
>
> ii libfile-rsyncp-perl 0.68-1.1+b1
>
> Is this OK?
I guess so. I have 0.64-1 on etch. You could try downgrading (dependencies
permitting) just in case. 'apt-get install libfile-rsyncp-perl=0.64-1' - you'd
need an etch source in sources.list. There don't seem to be any important
changes between those versions.
> > possible, try a command line rsync with the '--protocol=28'
> > switch to see if native rsync has the same issue or not.
>
> Plain "rsync" (no ssh tunnel) with that switch is working and syncing:
>
> rsync -rtz -vvvv --protocol=28 --delete --ignore-errors --numeric-ids
> --delete-excluded --stats --progress mail.omvsa.ch::profilo/
> /mnt/remote/Omv/daily.0/profilo/
Sorry, I meant a command line most closely resembling what BackupPC uses.
Remove the '--server --sender', obviously. Try with that first, and if it gets
stuck, add a '-v' or two (or four) and maybe '-P'.
Regards,
Holger
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [BackupPC-users] Sending csums, cnt = 0, phase = 1 - Backups stuck!, Boniforti Flavio
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Sending csums, cnt = 0, phase = 1 - Backups stuck!, Boniforti Flavio
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Sending csums, cnt = 0, phase = 1 - Backups stuck!, Boniforti Flavio
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Sending csums, cnt = 0, phase = 1 - Backups stuck!, Boniforti Flavio
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Sending csums, cnt = 0, phase = 1 - Backups stuck!, Holger Parplies
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Sending csums, cnt = 0, phase = 1 - Backups stuck!, Boniforti Flavio
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Sending csums, cnt = 0, phase = 1 - Backups stuck!,
Holger Parplies <=
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Sending csums, cnt = 0, phase = 1 - Backups stuck!, Boniforti Flavio
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Sending csums, cnt = 0, phase = 1 - Backups stuck!, Boniforti Flavio
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Sending csums, cnt = 0, phase = 1 - Backups stuck!, Holger Parplies
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Sending csums, cnt = 0, phase = 1 - Backups stuck!, Boniforti Flavio
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Sending csums, cnt = 0, phase = 1 - Backups stuck!, Craig Barratt
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Sending csums, cnt = 0, phase = 1 - Backups stuck!, Boniforti Flavio
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Sending csums, cnt = 0, phase = 1 - Backups stuck!, Les Mikesell
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Sending csums, cnt = 0, phase = 1 - Backups stuck!, Boniforti Flavio
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Sending csums, cnt = 0, phase = 1 - Backups stuck!, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)
- Re: [BackupPC-users] Sending csums, cnt = 0, phase = 1 - Backups stuck!, Boniforti Flavio
|
|
|