BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsync to Windows client very slow

2008-05-26 02:07:08
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsync to Windows client very slow
From: "Hendrik Friedel" <hen_mail AT web DOT de>
To: "'Kurt Jasper'" <kurt.jasper AT googlemail DOT com>, "'BackupPC User List'" <backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 08:06:06 +0200
Hi,

> 3) The best choice was/is/seems to be to use rsyncd.
> I got excellent network speed and all files were succesfully 
> backed up. 
> Compared to Samba you can use Includes and Excludes lists. So 
> you get all the benefits from rsync, but save the extra work 
> to setup SSH and root-access for the BackupPC user.
> 
> So rsync is the way to go :-)

Sorry for the naiv question: 
What's the difference between rsync and rsyncd as transfer method? (A link
would be sufficient)

Greetings,
Hendrik


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/