Am Freitag, den 28.10.2005, 14:28 +0200 schrieb Thomas Wegner:
Hello. I will answer to myself.
> Am Freitag, den 28.10.2005, 13:07 +0200 schrieb Alexander Jolk:
> 
> > >>Could you try without a changer, or debug your changer script?  That 
> > >>might be the problem.
> > > 
> > > I have no changer and in amanda.conf is no changer defined.
> > > ----------------------------------------------
> > > backup@chef:~$ amtape backup_woche device
> > > amtape: no tpchanger specified in "/etc/amanda/backup_woche/amanda.conf"
> > > -------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > That's an error message I believe, even though it's not evidently worded 
> > as such.  You seem to have specified runtapes > 1 without giving a 
> > changer.  Either configure a changer if you want more than one tape per 
> > run, or just set runtapes to 1.
> No, I didn't configured any changer or any runtapes. This is my
> amanda.conf:
I took a look at the FAQ on www.amanda.org and read the "how to
configure tape changer" chapter. One suggestions is to set runtapes to 1
as you wrote and comment out tpchanger. 
But this won't work on my machine. The error message is the same as
ever.
Then I've tried 'runtapes 1000' and 'tpchanger "chg-manual" '. This
seems to work. But I wonder about the short time amanda uses for backup
my /home directory.
How can I proof if backup was correct?
When I start 'amrecover -C /etc/amanda/backup_woche/ -s localhost -t
localhost' as user backup amanda tells me that amrecover must run as
root.
When I start amrecover as root the following message appears:
------------------------%<------------------------------------------
root@chef:/home/tommi # amrecover -C /etc/amanda/backup_woche/ -s
localhost -t localhost
AMRECOVER Version 2.4.5. Contacting server on localhost ...
220 chef AMANDA index server (2.4.5) ready.
500 Access not allowed: [access as backup not allowed from
root@localhost] amandahostsauth failed
-----------------%<------------------------------------------------

In /root/.amandahosts is an entry 'localhost root'.


Has anyone an idea?


Thomas