Amanda-Users

Re: Amanda Compression

2004-09-23 12:38:46
Subject: Re: Amanda Compression
From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>
To: Ivan Petrovich <laveer AT tuphaan.engr.wichita DOT edu>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:35:07 -0400
On Thursday 23 September 2004 11:01, Ivan Petrovich wrote:
>Paul, Jon, & Gene,
>
>My claim was based on experience of running a test configuration
> once, and observing an 8-hr run time, then after turning off
> software compression, observing that the time was reduced in half.
> I immediately abandoned software compression.
>
>Are you suggesting that once Amanda has run once (for 8 hrs, using
>gzip both in "estimate" and "dump"), it should not need to run gzip
>for the estimate phase ever again, and will therefore only take the
>"normal" amount of time (4 hrs, using gzip only for "dump") to
>run?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Ivan

While I'm not familiar with your setup Ivan, an 8 hour runtime would 
seem to indicate configuration problems, like doing all compression 
on the server rather than offloading it to the clients, possibly a 
high rate of network errors due to bad cabling or any combination of 
all the things that Murphy guy can dream up.

Its somewhat of an unwritten rule that a drive big enough to do the 
system at hand will usually do it in about 2 to 3 hours if all else 
is nominal.  If it can't, then its time for a bigger, faster drive.

You might consider posting the amanda.conf and your disklist to see if 
someone can suggest improvements.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.26% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>