Re: Pornography
2003-03-20 21:46:37
Kirk Strauser wrote:
>
> At 2003-03-20T20:42:52Z, Scott Mcdermott <smcdermott AT questra DOT com>
> writes:
>
> > There is no reason someone should not want to subscribe to the list to
> > post.
>
> That's not true:
>
> "Oh, crap, my server just melted, and I'm having trouble getting Amanda to
> work! I need an answer ASAP! I know, I'll send an email to
> amanda-users AT amanda DOT org from my home email address, even though I
> don't want
> to flood my slow home connection with a bunch of mailing lists..."
You forgot the part about, "But, my job is on the line, so I'll do whatever it
takes to get this machine restored, and worry about unsubscribing later."
Marty
--
Marty Shannon, RHCE (@ home)
mailto:mshannon AT domovina DOT org
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: Pornography, (continued)
- Re: Pornography, Scott Mcdermott
- Re: Pornography, Marty Shannon, RHCE
- Re: Pornography, Jon LaBadie
- Re: Pornography, Brian Cuttler
- Re: Pornography, Scott Mcdermott
- RE: Pornography, Thomas Hu
- Re: Pornography, Scott Mcdermott
- [off-topic, hopefully final word: spam to amanda lists] Re: Pornography, Todd Kover
|
|
|