Re: Pornography
2003-03-20 15:33:10
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 at 12:46pm, Marty Shannon, RHCE wrote
>
> > > I'm not getting that spam via the list. maybe my address got
> > > out that way but its not the vector for the incoming.
> >
> > That's very odd. All the spam I get is through the list -- porn or
> > otherwise.
> >
> > Why is the list set up to allow non-subscribers to post to it?
>
> To allow open discussion. Most lists *I'm* on are like this (and
> unmoderated).
Ok, is it worth:
subscribers getting spammed;
the additional load/cost on the server (and recipients) to send (and recieve)
spam that will ostensibly never be seen;
the loss of subscribers who can neither filter their email
(companies/organizations do not necessarily behave rationally) nor access an
external mail address (perhaps due to privacy issues)?
I think not.
*All* lists *I'm* on -- with the exception of this one -- do not permit any
access by non-subscribers (except to subscribe, of course).
Marty
--
Marty Shannon, RHCE (@ home)
mailto:mshannon AT domovina DOT org
|
|
|