ADSM-L

Re: %Util vs %Migr

1998-12-18 12:36:24
Subject: Re: %Util vs %Migr
From: "Moir,Betsy" <betsy.moir AT ABBOTT DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 11:36:24 -0600
Thanks - I think this is going to help.  One other question - My server
support guy (he's taking over from someone else here) wanted me to ask why
you had decided to turn caching off.  He thinks caching seems to be a very
good idea and he didn't get a very clear answer from his predecessor as to
why she had turned it off.

Thanks for your input.




ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu on 12/18/98 08:39:10 AM
Please respond to ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu @ INTERNET
To: ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu @ INTERNET
cc:
Subject: Re: %Util vs %Migr

In <0055600006466605000002L052*@MHS>, on 12/18/98
   at 07:39 AM, "Moir,Betsy" <betsy.moir AT ABBOTT DOT COM> said:

>Sorry -  I forgot to mention that we turned caching off.  That's why we
>expected to see %UTIL and %MIGR figures to be about the same most of the
>time.  Any other thoughts?

Just turning caching off doesn't clear the cached files from the diskpool.
You need to do one of a number of things.
1. Fill the diskpool to 100%.  this will cause the cached versions to be
released to make room for the new files.
2. Migrate down to 0, then do move data commands on all the
disk volumes.  This will free the cached images.

When I turned caching off, I did #2.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
Bill Colwell
Bill Colwell
C. S. Draper Lab
Cambridge, Ma.
bcolwell AT draper DOT com
-----------------------------------------------------------
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>