Re: %Util vs %Migr
1998-12-18 13:41:59
Subject: |
Re: %Util vs %Migr |
From: |
Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU> |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Dec 1998 13:41:59 -0500 |
Betsy - One would not use caching if the recall pattern did not make
its use worthwhile, to eliminate some overhead. In most
shops, an initial disk in a backup storage pool hierarchy basically
serves as a buffer rather than a repository: it's usually "write-only"
with minimal prospect of retrieval. In such situations this just
presents ADSM with more work to do in maintaining the cache, including
rapidly having to dismiss cache images when more space is called for.
Caching makes a lot more sense for Archive and HSM storage pool disk,
where recall of files is more probable.
Richard Sims, BU
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- %Util vs %Migr, Moir,Betsy
- Re: %Util vs %Migr, Bohnsack, JA Jim (6030)
- Re: %Util vs %Migr, buser andreas
- Re: %Util vs %Migr, Moir,Betsy
- Re: %Util vs %Migr, Bill Colwell
- Re[2]: %Util vs %Migr, James SPORER
- Re: %Util vs %Migr, Moir,Betsy
- Re: %Util vs %Migr, Joel Fuhrman
- Re: %Util vs %Migr, Bill Colwell
- Re: %Util vs %Migr,
Richard Sims <=
- Re: %Util vs %Migr, Kampa, Ray (MCI)
|
|
|