Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] eliminating volume pools

2008-12-18 11:25:10
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] eliminating volume pools
From: A Darren Dunham <ddunham AT taos DOT com>
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:08:31 +0000
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:37:05AM -0500, erik.robertello AT firstinvestors DOT 
com wrote:
> My previous post should have read:
> 
> I am looking to eliminate volume pools in an effort to utilized
> hardware encryption (limited to 2 volume pools).  Is there another way
> to experience the same results of using volume pools "without" using
> volume pools?

I guess that depends on what you're using volume pools for in the first
place.  What do you lose in your environment by removing them?

The main purpose behind them is volume segregation.  Easily preventing
certain data from being on the same volume as other data.  Ease of
reporting/identification is a plus as well.  Depending why you're doing
these (and the particulars), you might be able to come up with
alternatives.

Creative use of different retention policies (which use separate tapes
by default) and scripting for identification can help.

-- 
Darren
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu