Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Windows 2003: Faulting application bpbkar32.exe

2007-03-29 03:13:25
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Windows 2003: Faulting application bpbkar32.exe
From: gilles.poussard at airbus.com (POUSSARD, Gilles (INFOTEL))
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:13:25 +0200
Hi Tim,

Did Symantec send you a specific bpbkar32 binary or did you go to 6.0 MP3 
instead of 6.0 MP4 ??

Best regards,

Gilles.

-----Message d'origine-----
De : veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu]De la part de
Wilkinson, Tim
Envoy? : jeudi 29 mars 2007 08:13
? : Justin Piszcz; veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Objet : Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows 2003: Faulting application bpbkar32.exe


Have a look at http://support.veritas.com/docs/286954

We had an issue with ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES on a server; if we specified the
drives explicitly it was OK. Apparently the problem was that it had DFS
and this was a known bug; we were sent a binary by Symantec and this
fixed the problem. It now works fine.
This obviously may not be the same issue.

Cheers,

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: Thursday, 29 March 2007 4:18 AM
To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Windows 2003: Faulting application bpbkar32.exe

When trying to backup the registry, and ONLY the registry, I get this:

Faulting application bpbkar32.exe, version 5.1.0.164, faulting module
vssapi.dll, version 5.2.3790.1830, fault address 0x00020030.

For more information, see Help and Support Center at
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.

1. Master Server & Media Server: All 6.0MP4.
2. Client is 5.1MP4.
3. Yes, I have added the client and turned off all snapshotting
technology.
4. However, I believe it is still used for the registry backup.

The backups for all of the hard drives/arrays, not a single failure.
This ONLY occurs with the registry.

I do not though this is Windows 2003 R2 on the x86_64 platform.  I
believe the client installed was the regular 32bit client; but x86_64
should be backwards compatible with 32bit, yes?  At least for simple
things, I am not sure if the registry requires the 64bit MP4 patch?  Has
anyone dealt with anything like this before?  There is just this one
pesky server that this is happening on, all of the server servers use,
ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES and backup the registry with no issues.

Justin.

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence 
Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 
1914.  If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact 
the sender and delete the email.



_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

This mail has originated outside your organization, either from an external 
partner or the Global Internet.
Keep this in mind if you answer this message.



This e-mail is intended only for the above addressee. It may contain privileged 
information.
If you are not the addressee you must not copy, distribute, disclose or use any 
of the information in it. 
If you have received it in error please delete it and immediately notify the 
sender.
Security Notice: all e-mail, sent to or from this address, may be accessed by 
someone other than the recipient, for system management and security reasons. 
This access is controlled under Regulation of security reasons.
This access is controlled under Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, 
Lawful Business Practises.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>