Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Windows 2003: Faulting application bpbkar32.exe

2007-03-29 04:09:36
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Windows 2003: Faulting application bpbkar32.exe
From: jpiszcz at lucidpixels.com (Justin Piszcz)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:09:36 -0400 (EDT)
Yup the ntbackup backed up the Shadow Copy Components with no problems.


On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Len Boyle wrote:

> Did you check the url
>
> http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_Enterprise_Server/278064.pdf
>
> To see if the client you used is supported.
>
> You can do one thing to rule out netbackup. Try backing up the server with 
> the ntbackup command that is shipped with windows 2003. If the ntbackup 
> command fails on the system state backup, then one can assume that  the 
> problem is not with netbackup.
>
> len
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces 
> at mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Justin Piszcz
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 6:29 PM
> To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows 2003: Faulting application bpbkar32.exe
>
> No takers? :(
>
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>> When trying to backup the registry, and ONLY the registry, I get this:
>>
>> Faulting application bpbkar32.exe, version 5.1.0.164, faulting module
>> vssapi.dll, version 5.2.3790.1830, fault address 0x00020030.
>>
>> For more information, see Help and Support Center at
>> http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
>>
>> 1. Master Server & Media Server: All 6.0MP4.
>> 2. Client is 5.1MP4.
>> 3. Yes, I have added the client and turned off all snapshotting
>> technology.
>> 4. However, I believe it is still used for the registry backup.
>>
>> The backups for all of the hard drives/arrays, not a single failure.
>> This ONLY occurs with the registry.
>>
>> I do not though this is Windows 2003 R2 on the x86_64 platform.  I
>> believe the client installed was the regular 32bit client; but x86_64
>> should be backwards compatible with 32bit, yes?  At least for simple
>> things, I am not sure if the registry requires the 64bit MP4 patch?
>> Has anyone dealt with anything like this before?  There is just this
>> one pesky server that this is happening on, all of the server servers
>> use, ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES and backup the registry with no issues.
>>
>> Justin.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
>> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>