[Veritas-bu] FQDNs or Not ? [recommendations please]
2006-05-04 11:19:51
Subject: |
[Veritas-bu] FQDNs or Not ? [recommendations please] |
From: |
austin.murphy AT gmail DOT com (Austin Murphy) |
Date: |
Thu, 4 May 2006 11:19:51 -0400 |
The bottom line is NetBackup REQUIRES 100% accurate, reliable, and
unambiguous name resolution.
Some considerations:
- shorter names are generally easier to read and say.
- FDQNs are more likely to be unambiguous, especially in large, mixed
environments.
- DNS makes sharing hostname information easy
- external dependencies (like DNS) can increase the risk of failure.
- In smaller environments, it's easy to work with local files.
Austin
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Veritas-bu] FQDNs or Not ? [recommendations please], (continued)
[Veritas-bu] FQDNs or Not ? [recommendations please], Ed Wilts
[Veritas-bu] FQDNs or Not ? [recommendations please], Rockey Reed
[Veritas-bu] FQDNs or Not ? [recommendations please], Jeff Lightner
[Veritas-bu] FQDNs or Not ? [recommendations please], Greenberg, Katherine A
[Veritas-bu] FQDNs or Not ? [recommendations please], Jeff Lightner
[Veritas-bu] FQDNs or Not ? [recommendations please], WEAVER, Simon
[Veritas-bu] FQDNs or Not ? [recommendations please], WEAVER, Simon
|
|
|