If I set the retention policy and the browse policy on the client is greater 
than the retention on the pool, is NetWorker "smart" enough to resolve that?

On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Preston de Guise wrote:
> On 19/03/2008, at 7:08 AM, David Dulek wrote:
> > I am now using 7.4.1 SP1 and ...
> >
> > I am pleasantly surprise to let everyone know that "apparently" that
> > behavior
> > is no longer true.  My index saves "appear" to have the same browse
> > time as
> > the clients that were backed up.
> >
> > I am in the process of changing all the clients to have different
> > browse and
> > retention policies based on the group that they are in so I didn't
> > know that
> > changed until today's backups ran.  ( I had to create 3 client
> > definitions,
> > one for each of the groups they are in.  I assume this is still true
> > since I
> > could not find a browse/retention policy on the groups )
>
> Additionally, from 7.3.x onwards, you do have the option of setting a
> retention policy on the individual pools, which will further force
> shared/same retention periods. While this functionality appeared to be
> a little flaky in the initial 7.3.x releases, it seems to have
> stabilised around the 7.3.2 patch and 7.3.3.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Preston.
>
> --
> Preston de Guise
>
>
> "Enterprise Systems Backup and Recovery: A Corporate Insurance
> Policy", due out August 15 2008:
>
> http://www.crcpress.com/shopping_cart/products/product_detail.asp?sku=AU639
>6&isbn=9781420076394&parent_id=&pc=


-- 

David Dulek
Storage Administration Lead
Fastenal Company
E-mail: ddulek AT fastenal DOT com
Phone: (507) 313-7033
Fax:   (507) 453-8333

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER