Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Windows client 7.0.5 broken?

2016-02-26 06:36:32
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Windows client 7.0.5 broken?
From: Randy Katz <rkatz AT simplicityhosting DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 03:33:35 -0800
If it's any help I was running bacula-win64-5.2.10 until recently and
upgraded to bacula-enterprise-win64-7.4.0 without a hitch. Directors are
all running 7.4, were running each upgrade until 7.4 previously.

On 2/26/2016 1:28 AM, Cejka Rudolf wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote (2016/02/26):
>> I have no idea what "developer's gift" is but to the best of my 
>> knowledge no Windows 7.0.5 ever existed.
> Oops, I'm sorry I was so unclear. I have found the original
> status report:
>
> http://blog.bacula.org/bacula-status-report-30-august-2014/
>
> Yes, it was not developers, but "friends" and you decided that it
> would be "contributors that are listed in the AUTHORS file".
>
> Please, was it meant as one particular version, which is 7.0.5,
> or as access to Bacula Windows binaries with upgrades, possibly
> with some delay?
>
> Thank you very much.
>
>> On 02/26/2016 08:49 AM, Cejka Rudolf wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>    after Windows client upgrade from public 5.2.10 to developers'
>>> gift 7.0.5, I have noticed that incremental jobs started to be too
>>> big and too slow. Before upgrade with 5.2.10:
>>>
>>>    Elapsed time:           4 hours 28 mins 43 secs
>>>    FD Files Written:       180,897
>>>    FD Bytes Written:       18,411,348,578 (18.41 GB)
>>>
>>> After upgrade with 7.0.5:
>>>
>>>    Elapsed time:           1 day 8 hours 31 mins 19 secs
>>>    FD Files Written:       10,770,656
>>>    FD Bytes Written:       24,493,173,950 (24.49 GB)
>>>
>>> The difference is in ~ 10,000,000 entries.
>>>
>>> Full job has ~ 33,000,000 entries, where there are ~ 10,000,000
>>> directories and ~ 23,000,000 files (strange itself). Job listing
>>> confirmed, that 7.0.5 Windows client includes all directory
>>> entries on the server in the incremental backup. Please, is there
>>> a configuration possibility to work around this problem?
>>>
>>> I have tried 7.4.0 for personal use also, and it works like 5.2.10,
>>> so maybe just 7.0.5 has this bug? Meantmime, I had to return to
>>> 5.2.10.
>>>
>>> Thank you.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users