Hello Rudolf,
Yes, I see. I was referring to the Enterprise Windows binaries, and they
were actually version 8.0 or 8.2 that (I forgot) I had renumbered to be
7.0.5 to correspond to the community release. Note: no one complained
about those binaries working with Bacula community Dir and SD of 7.0.5.
If you paid for those Windows binaries, the deal was that you could take
any update that may be posted within 6 months, but after that if you
wanted a newer version you had to update. However, now the Windows
binaries are free on the Bacula.org web site for personal use.
I recommend that you move up to 7.4.0 and use the Windows binaries
posted on the web site or for non-personal use get the binaries from
Bacula Systems.
Best regards,
Kern
On 02/26/2016 07:28 PM, Cejka Rudolf wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote (2016/02/26):
>> I have no idea what "developer's gift" is but to the best of my
>> knowledge no Windows 7.0.5 ever existed.
>
> Oops, I'm sorry I was so unclear. I have found the original
> status report:
>
> http://blog.bacula.org/bacula-status-report-30-august-2014/
>
> Yes, it was not developers, but "friends" and you decided that it
> would be "contributors that are listed in the AUTHORS file".
>
> Please, was it meant as one particular version, which is 7.0.5,
> or as access to Bacula Windows binaries with upgrades, possibly
> with some delay?
>
> Thank you very much.
>
>> On 02/26/2016 08:49 AM, Cejka Rudolf wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> after Windows client upgrade from public 5.2.10 to developers'
>>> gift 7.0.5, I have noticed that incremental jobs started to be too
>>> big and too slow. Before upgrade with 5.2.10:
>>>
>>> Elapsed time: 4 hours 28 mins 43 secs
>>> FD Files Written: 180,897
>>> FD Bytes Written: 18,411,348,578 (18.41 GB)
>>>
>>> After upgrade with 7.0.5:
>>>
>>> Elapsed time: 1 day 8 hours 31 mins 19 secs
>>> FD Files Written: 10,770,656
>>> FD Bytes Written: 24,493,173,950 (24.49 GB)
>>>
>>> The difference is in ~ 10,000,000 entries.
>>>
>>> Full job has ~ 33,000,000 entries, where there are ~ 10,000,000
>>> directories and ~ 23,000,000 files (strange itself). Job listing
>>> confirmed, that 7.0.5 Windows client includes all directory
>>> entries on the server in the incremental backup. Please, is there
>>> a configuration possibility to work around this problem?
>>>
>>> I have tried 7.4.0 for personal use also, and it works like 5.2.10,
>>> so maybe just 7.0.5 has this bug? Meantmime, I had to return to
>>> 5.2.10.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
