Thanks for the confirmation that bacula-enterprise-win64-7.4.0 works for 
you :-)

On 02/26/2016 09:33 PM, Randy Katz wrote:
> If it's any help I was running bacula-win64-5.2.10 until recently and
> upgraded to bacula-enterprise-win64-7.4.0 without a hitch. Directors are
> all running 7.4, were running each upgrade until 7.4 previously.
>
> On 2/26/2016 1:28 AM, Cejka Rudolf wrote:
>> Kern Sibbald wrote (2016/02/26):
>>> I have no idea what "developer's gift" is but to the best of my
>>> knowledge no Windows 7.0.5 ever existed.
>> Oops, I'm sorry I was so unclear. I have found the original
>> status report:
>>
>> http://blog.bacula.org/bacula-status-report-30-august-2014/
>>
>> Yes, it was not developers, but "friends" and you decided that it
>> would be "contributors that are listed in the AUTHORS file".
>>
>> Please, was it meant as one particular version, which is 7.0.5,
>> or as access to Bacula Windows binaries with upgrades, possibly
>> with some delay?
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>>> On 02/26/2016 08:49 AM, Cejka Rudolf wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>     after Windows client upgrade from public 5.2.10 to developers'
>>>> gift 7.0.5, I have noticed that incremental jobs started to be too
>>>> big and too slow. Before upgrade with 5.2.10:
>>>>
>>>>     Elapsed time:           4 hours 28 mins 43 secs
>>>>     FD Files Written:       180,897
>>>>     FD Bytes Written:       18,411,348,578 (18.41 GB)
>>>>
>>>> After upgrade with 7.0.5:
>>>>
>>>>     Elapsed time:           1 day 8 hours 31 mins 19 secs
>>>>     FD Files Written:       10,770,656
>>>>     FD Bytes Written:       24,493,173,950 (24.49 GB)
>>>>
>>>> The difference is in ~ 10,000,000 entries.
>>>>
>>>> Full job has ~ 33,000,000 entries, where there are ~ 10,000,000
>>>> directories and ~ 23,000,000 files (strange itself). Job listing
>>>> confirmed, that 7.0.5 Windows client includes all directory
>>>> entries on the server in the incremental backup. Please, is there
>>>> a configuration possibility to work around this problem?
>>>>
>>>> I have tried 7.4.0 for personal use also, and it works like 5.2.10,
>>>> so maybe just 7.0.5 has this bug? Meantmime, I had to return to
>>>> 5.2.10.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users