Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula backup Clusters

2014-05-24 02:49:46
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula backup Clusters
From: Radosław Korzeniewski <radoslaw AT korzeniewski DOT net>
To: Dmitri Maziuk <dmaziuk AT bmrb.wisc DOT edu>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 08:47:13 +0200
Hello,

2014-05-23 16:37 GMT+02:00 Dmitri Maziuk <dmaziuk AT bmrb.wisc DOT edu>:
On 5/23/2014 8:35 AM, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
> My suggestion was a very simple. Do not install/configure another
> bacula-fd but simply and clever use existing configuration. In my case
> it is a change of 4 parameters and adding a new client definition - your
> require a lot more.

FWIW I failed to get that to work back when I was playing with it, don't
remember why. I ended up with what Josh suggests: as 2nd bacula-fd
started by pacemaker and *listening on another port* because fd won't
bind to eth0.0:9102 when eth0:9102 is already taken.

Both solutions will work fine. You are free to choose the best for you.

I've deployed a lot of clusters with bacula-fd using both solutions depending on customer requirements.
During my deployments, I've found that setup of dedicated bacula-fd for cluster service takes a lot of time compared to the simple solution, which takes 2-3 minutes including testing. :)

best regards
--
Radosław Korzeniewski
radoslaw AT korzeniewski DOT net
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>