Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Intervention needed, asking for tape not in library

2013-07-03 13:59:01
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Intervention needed, asking for tape not in library
From: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
To: "Kevin B. Zimmerman" <kevin.zimmerman AT kitware DOT com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 13:56:53 -0400
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 1:53 PM, John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com> 
wrote:
>> http://www.bacula.org/en/dev-manual/main/main/Autochanger_Resource.html#SECTION002950000000000000000
>> "...Bacula will as a preference, use Volumes that it knows to be in the
>> autochanger before accessing Volumes that are not in the autochanger.
>> This prevents unneeded operator intervention."
>>
>> Behavior doesn't quite match docs in this case, as it appears the
>> InChanger flag is ignored in favor of the Enabled flag when deciding on
>> which tape to request next, at least as far as Spool jobs are concerned
>> (that's all I've really been using so far).
>>
>>
>> So, bug report?  Doc fix?  Both?
>>
>
> I say Doc addition. Since I do not believe the Doc is wrong. Just that
> the information you need is in 2 different places.

What I mean by this is bacula does honor the InChanger flag if there
is an appendable volume in the changer. It however will not recycle a
volume in the changer if there is a volume outside the changer that is
appendable.

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users