On 05/27/13 07:42, DAHLBOKUM Markus (FPT INDUSTRIAL) wrote:
> up to now I did my backup via FD and SD on two different machines. But
> as the main job gets a broken pipe when waiting for the second tape, I
> now switched back to FD and SD on the same machine and mounting the
> directories to be backed up as NFS mounts.
> 
> The transfer rate over the network FD was between 40 and 65 MB/s (1Gbit
> LAN, LTO4 drive).
> 
> Now with NFS I get 600 kB/s.

Doing backups over NFS is almost invariably a bad idea.  You would be
much better off to simply put a Bacula client on the machine you're now
backing up via NFS mounts and back it up directly.

(Truth to tell, this is even more true of the machine in question is
running Linux.  The Linux nfsd, honestly, is and always has been a poor
implementation.)


-- 
  Phil Stracchino, CDK#2     DoD#299792458     ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
  alaric AT caerllewys DOT net   alaric AT metrocast DOT net   phil AT 
co.ordinate DOT org
  Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, SQL wrangler, Free Stater
                 It's not the years, it's the mileage.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service 
that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users