Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Verifying backup chain

2013-05-17 06:35:51
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Verifying backup chain
From: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>
To: Dylan Martin <Dylan.Martin AT seattlecolleges DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 11:32:30 +0100
>>>>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 11:38:44 -0700, Dylan Martin said:
> 
> When restoring, is the chain of backups determined then, or is it recorded
> in the catalog or backup files?  By that I mean, does the director
> calculate which backups to use by looking at the timestamp on each and
> assuming that the incremental following a previous backup must be
> incremental relative to that backup?

Yes, it is based entirely on the timestamps of what it finds in the catalog
(last full + last diff + all following incrs).


>                                       Or, is there somewhere recorded the
> time stamp which each incremental/differential is relative to?  For
> example:  Say I have a full backup called A, and three incrementals called
> B,C & D.  If I removed C, would a restore job restore A, then B then stop
> because C is missing, or would it continue with D because D is the next
> successful backup?  I'm assuming here that the catalog and volumes are in
> sync.  The madman who removed C removed the volume and the records from the
> DB.

It will restore A, B and D.

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform delivers complete
security visibility with the essential security capabilities. Easily and
efficiently configure, manage, and operate all of your security controls
from a single console and one unified framework. Download a free trial.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/alienvault_d2d
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>