Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow
2012-09-10 07:41:27
On 6/09/2012 12:02, Paul Van Wambeke wrote:
> On 5/09/2012 11:21, James Harper wrote:
>>> Using iperf I measured following performances :
>>>
>>> bacula-fd = the windows server 2008 R2 host, 1Gb/sec NIC bacula-dir = a
>>> linux
>>> ubuntu 10.04 PC, 1 100Mb/sec NIC bacula-sd = a linux ubuntu 10.04 server, 1
>>> Gbite/sec NIC
>>>
>>>
>>> iperf server iperf client Performance
>>> ---------------- --------------- --------------------
>>>
>>> bacula-fd bacula-dir 10 MBytes/sec
>>> bacula-fd bacula-sd 111 MBytes/sec
>>> bacula-dir bacula-fd 10 MBytes/sec
>>> bacula-sd bacula-fd 26 MBytes/sec
>>>
>>> So normally the bacula client should be able to write to the bacula storage
>>> at
>>> 26MBytes/sec ?
>>>
>>> Any suggestions ?
>>>
>> Any crappy computer made in the last 5 years should be able to saturate a
>> gigabit link using iperf. The fact that you are only getting 26Mbytes/second
>> fd->sd is a bit worrying... it's well above the 1Mbit/second that bacula
>> appears to be limited to but it's still an indication of a major problem. I
>> haven't had that much experience with Hyper-V for performance testing but it
>> should be able to approach Xen which easily gets gigabit speeds for Windows
>> VMs. Is your switch up to the job?
>>
>> James
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Aucun virus trouve dans ce message.
>> Analyse effectuee par AVG - www.avg.fr
>> Version: 2012.0.2197 / Base de donnees virale: 2437/5249 - Date: 04/09/2012
>>
>>
>>
> Probably we could fine tune the switches, but I still believe the
> main problem resided on the interaction between the bacula-fd and the
> host server's network config ...
>
> We have decided to re-install the windows server, this time
> without enabling the hyper-v role ... will try again and let you know if
> this changes something.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Paul
>
Well, we re-installed the windows servers without hyper-V or any other
role : no change in transfer rate.
A Windows 7 laptop running bacula-fd 5.2.9 transfers at 35MBytes/sec ...
So it seems to be linked to the fact that the server is a W 2008 R2
server ...
Am I the only one having this problem, anybody succeeded in backup-up a
W2008 R2 server with Bacula at correct transfer speeds ?
Kind regards
Paul
--
Paul VAN WAMBEKE
ICT OpenUp! and GPI Projects
National Botanic Garden of Belgium
Bouchout Domain, Nieuwelaan 38
1860 Meise
Tel: ++32 2 260 09 66
Fax: ++32 2 260 09 45
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow, Paul Van Wambeke
- Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow, James Harper
- Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow, Paul Van Wambeke
- Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow, James Harper
- Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow, Paul Van Wambeke
- Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow,
Paul Van Wambeke <=
- Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow, Fahrer, Julian
- Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow, Paul Van Wambeke
- Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow, Fahrer, Julian
- Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow, lst_hoe02
|
|
|