Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: bacula possibly confused about label

2012-09-07 09:05:39
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: bacula possibly confused about label
From: "Clark, Patricia A." <clarkpa AT ornl DOT gov>
To: bacula-users <Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:02:54 -0400
On 9/7/12 7:51 AM, "John Drescher" <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com> wrote:


>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>From: Chris Ord <Chris.Ord AT digitalpictures.com DOT au>
>Date: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:10 PM
>Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula possibly confused about label
>To: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
>
>
>John,
>that is the confusing part(see bold)
>
>Device "Drive_0" (/dev/nst0) open but no Bacula volume is currently
>mounted.
>    Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume "VARCD003", <-waiting
>for tape
>       Pool:        ArcD
>       Media type:  LTO5
>    Slot 4 is loaded in drive 0. <- It's telling  me it's loaded
>I know the write protect is not on as the tape was written to
>previously on the last archive run.
>I know bacula 'knows' about the tape because it was used previously
>about a month ago.
>
>Anyway as I have labelled all devices upto about VARCD007 I would
>expect bacula at the very least to
>a) offer to label the tape because the barcode calls it VARCD003.
>b) tell me which tape is in fact loaded.
>Confusing to say the least.
>
>I suppose really is there a way to tell bacula that this is in fact
>the correct tape and carry on?
>
>Cheers
>Chris
>On 07/09/2012, at 12:53 PM, John Drescher wrote:
>
>sorry I should have been a bit more specific,
>
>the tape is mounted, both bacula and mtx thinks it's mounted. Bacula
>doesn't think the tape is a bacula archive(it is).
>
>
>
>I am not sure about bacula thinking the volume is mounted when the sd
>says it is not mounted however could the write protect be on?
>
>John
>
>
>*Chris Ord | I.T. Manager*
>email   chris.ord AT digitalpictures.com DOT au
>
>switch  +61 2 9439 5922
>fax       +61 2 9436 3554
>
>Digital Pictures
>
>This communication is confidential and may contain legally privileged
>information. If you are
>not the named recipient, please contact us immediately. You must not
>copy, use or disclose
>this communication, or any attachments or information in it, without our
>prior consent.
>
>-- 
>John M. Drescher
>>>>>>>>

The key info here is the "BLOCKED" on the drive.  The tape may be there,
but bacula cannot complete the mount operation.  I've had similar
situations.  Within bconsole or bat, work with the unmount, release, and
mount commands.  It may take a couple of passes to get that "BLOCKED"
removed.

Patti Clark
Information International Associates, Inc.
Linux Administrator and subcontractor to:
Research and Development Systems Support Oak Ridge National Laboratory







------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>