Hello.

I saw this post recently http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users AT 
lists.sourceforge DOT net/msg47393.html and it seems I'm affected by this 
problem too. Bacula shows extremely low performance in networks with high rtt. 
I have sd in Germany and client in USA. Bacula can make backups on speeds 
between 5 to 10 Mbit/s which is too slow as backups are up to 600 GB. With 
simple iperf test I can achieve transfer rates about 100-120 Mbit/s. Why bacula 
cannot do the same? Compression does not affect transfer speed. Client has 
plenty of free CPU/memory.

I've made ssh tunnel between hosts and set Address = 127.0.0.1 in Storage 
section. With this configuration I can see backups are running at speeds about 
100 Mbit/s.

Bacula version is 5.0.2 from Debian Lenny backports.

+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by reaper AT lmn DOT name via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users