Bacula-users

[Bacula-users] Performance with latent networks

2011-09-30 00:15:00
Subject: [Bacula-users] Performance with latent networks
From: reaper <bacula-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:12:46 -0700
sounds like your sysctl.conf needs tweaking? have you tried something like this 
on both sides? 

 kernel.msgmnb = 65536 
 kernel.msgmax = 65536 
 kernel.shmmax = 68719476736 
 kernel.shmall = 4294967296 

 # long fat pipes 
 net.core.wmem_max = 8388608 
 net.core.rmem_max = 8388608

Yes, I tried to tweak kernel first with no effect. BTW wouldn't badly tuned 
network stack affect other programs such as iperf and ssh?

+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by reaper AT lmn DOT name via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users