Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Who is right about the tape size: Bacula or the tapeloader??

2011-09-01 11:34:39
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Who is right about the tape size: Bacula or the tapeloader??
From: Stefan Michael Guenther <s.guenther AT in-put DOT de>
To: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:31:35 +0200
Hi,

> you do not impose a limit on how many bytes that bacula can write to a
> tape bacula will write as many bytes as it can up until it hits the
> first tape write error. At this point bacula assumes the tape is full.
> Check your dmesg to see if there are any problems. Also try a brand
> new LTO3 tape.
> 
here is the corresponding output of dmesg:

[    7.806343] st 3:0:1:0: Attached scsi tape st0
[    7.806345] st 3:0:1:0: st0: try direct i/o: yes (alignment 512 B)
[ 3295.705344] st0: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes.
[ 3299.906724] st0: Failed to read 65536 byte block with 64512 byte transfer.
[ 3856.794626] st0: Failed to read 65536 byte block with 64512 byte transfer.
[ 4027.852762] st0: Failed to read 65536 byte block with 64512 byte transfer.
[ 4173.406028] st0: Failed to read 65536 byte block with 64512 byte transfer.

And, yes, we already tried it with a brand new tape - same result.

Stefan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer -- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better 
price-free! And you'll get a free "Love Thy Logs" t-shirt when you
download Logger. Secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsisghtdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users