Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance

2011-07-25 11:08:36
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Performance
From: Rickifer Barros <rickiferbarros AT gmail DOT com>
To: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:06:17 -0300
I did this before....but, I didn't know how check in Debian if it really is being compressed by the tape drive. The only thing that I got was the bacula information about the SD and FD Written and the "mt" command in Linux don't say me the real data size of the volume, so I chose to trust on the software compression...YEAH I'm noob on Tape manipulation...  :t

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:57 AM, John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
2011/7/25 Rickifer Barros <rickiferbarros AT gmail DOT com>:
> Hello Guys...
>
> This weekend I did a backup with a size of 41.92 GB that took 1 hour and 24
> minutes with a rate of 8.27 MB/s.
>
> My Bacula Server is installed in a IBM server connected in a Tape Drive LTO4
> (120 MB/s) via SAS connection (3 Gb/s).
>
> I'm using Encryption and Compression Gzip6.

Disable software compression. The tape drive will compress much faster
than the client.

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Storage Efficiency Calculator
This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that
has been used successfully in hundreds of IBM storage optimization engage-
ments, worldwide.  Store less, Store more with what you own, Move data to 
the right place. Try It Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427378/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>