Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Reliable Backups without Tapes?

2011-07-15 08:31:32
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Reliable Backups without Tapes?
From: Paul Mather <paul AT gromit.dlib.vt DOT edu>
To: Ken Mandelberg <km AT mathcs.emory DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:28:44 -0400
On Jul 14, 2011, at 7:56 PM, Ken Mandelberg wrote:

> Under Legato the license restriction artificially keep the "file-device" 
> small relative to the tape storage. However, these days disks are 
> cheaper than tapes and license free we could afford a lot of disk space.

I know hard drives are cheap these days, but I didn't realise they were cheaper 
than tape nowadays.  LTO-4 media works out at less than 5 cents per GB 
(uncompressed) last time I bought it, and I believe LTO-5 is less than 4 cents 
per GB (again, uncompressed).

But, don't underestimate some of the perhaps-neglected advantages of tape:

- Easier to offsite for long-term archiving and disaster recovery
- WORM capability for regulatory compliance where needed
- Easier to expand total capacity---just buy more media
- Increasing capacity doesn't continually eat up rack space and drive up power 
consumption

Personally, I like the fact that Bacula supports a mixed disk/tape solution, 
allowing for disk to provide faster near-line access to more recent backups 
(e.g., incrementals) and tape for older material.

Cheers,

Paul.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AppSumo Presents a FREE Video for the SourceForge Community by Eric 
Ries, the creator of the Lean Startup Methodology on "Lean Startup 
Secrets Revealed." This video shows you how to validate your ideas, 
optimize your ideas and identify your business strategy.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appsumosfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users