>>>>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:35:15 -0400, Christian Tardif said:
>
> On 11/07/2011 14:34, Christian Tardif wrote:
> > On 11/07/11 12:15 PM, Adrian Reyer wrote:
> >> Never tried it myself, but I have seen some documentation yesterday
> >> about labling tapes when needed by issuing 'unmount' first. Doesn't this
> >> resolve your 'blocked' status?
> >> ->
> >> http://www.bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Brief_Tutorial.html#SECTION0016100000000000000000
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Adrian
> >
> > I'll give it a try tonight on a test environment but I think I've
> > already tried that.
> >
> > I'll let you know.
>
> Nope, this is not working. The tape drive is just not reacting at all...
> If this is a feature, this should be renamed as a bug, as there MUST be
> a way to push a label function even when the device is BLOCKED, waiting
> for a tape to be mounted or labelled.
>
> Luckily enough, I have the exact message I was talking about:
>
> 11-Jul 16:08 localhost-sd JobId 11321: Please mount Volume "LTO-E" or label a
> new one for:
> Job: fdld-E.2011-07-10_23.59.05_08
> Storage: "Ultrium-2" (/dev/nst2)
> Pool: E
> Media type: Ultrium2
Please post the output of running these commands in bconsole (with appropriate
responses):
unmount
<<insert a blank tape into the drive>>
label
mount
__Martin
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
