Il 17/03/2011 16:32, Mike Hendrie ha scritto:
> I do not have the firewall running on the windows computer or the linux
> box. Hmm
>
> Perhaps I will try the older bacula client  to see if that will work.
>
> On Mar 17, 2011 10:28 AM, "Steve Ellis" <ellis AT brouhaha DOT com
> <mailto:ellis AT brouhaha DOT com>> wrote:
>  > On 3/17/2011 7:30 AM, Mike Hendrie wrote:
>  >>
>  >> *I cannot telnet from the windows machine to any 9102 port, is that
>  >> the problem?*
>  >>
>  > Yes. That is definitely a problem (may not be the only one). I
>  > haven't been following this thread closely, but it could easily be
>  > either the windows firewall or linux. For windows firewall, you don't
>  > have to turn it off, just add the bacula daemon as an exception.
>  >
>  > -se
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
> A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
> for your organization - today and in the future.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Another idea (from experience): if you have a debian system as your
server platform, check /etc/hosts. By default the system fqdn name is
put as an alias for 127.0.0.1, causing problems with bacula.

HTH

Marcello

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users