Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line
2011-01-08 17:22:09
On 1/8/2011 4:46 AM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
> On 07/01/2011 14:53, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
>> On 07/01/11, Oliver Hoffmann (oh AT dom DOT de) wrote:
>>> I do full backups at the weekend and it just takes too long. 12h or so.
>>> bacula does one job after the other and I have a max. transfer rate of
>>> 11 to 12 MBytes/second due to the 100Mbit connection.
>>>
>>> For testing purpose I connected one client via crosslink (1Gbit on
>>> both sides) to the server. But I still have the same transfer rate. Why
>>> is that?
>> What sort of backups are you doing? Are you writing to tape? Are you
>> using spooling?
>>
> I am new(ish) to bacula, how does spooling speed up jobs, I have noticed
> similar issues, but because the same behavior appeared on three
> instances I've built recently. I'm very interested to learn how to
> improve performance.
This is called thread hi-jacking. Please do not do it. Please start a
new thread asking for information about spooling. But I think you'll
find many questions about spooling are already covered in the docs and
in the archives. :)
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gaining the trust of online customers is vital for the success of any company
that requires sensitive data to be transmitted over the Web. Learn how to
best implement a security strategy that keeps consumers' information secure
and instills the confidence they need to proceed with transactions.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
|
|