Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line

2011-01-07 14:30:37
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line
From: Silver Salonen <silver AT ultrasoft DOT ee>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 21:27:36 +0200
On Friday 07 January 2011 16:48:07 Oliver Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I do full backups at the weekend and it just takes too long. 12h or so.
> bacula does one job after the other and I have a max. transfer rate of
> 11 to 12 MBytes/second due to the 100Mbit connection.
> 
> For testing purpose I connected one client via crosslink (1Gbit on
> both sides) to the server. But I still have the same transfer rate. Why
> is that?
> 
> The communication definitely goes over 192.168.1.2/192.168.1.1.
> The settings on the client and server are pretty much default.
> 
> I copied an 1,1GB test file with scp through the 1Gbit line and had
> approx. 50MB/s. 
> Or with ftp:
> 1073741824 bytes sent in 10.61 secs (98867.6 kB/s).
> 
> Thx for hints,
> 
> Oliver

Years ago I did the same test and I found out that compression was to blame - 
when I turned off compression I got basically the speed of HDD writing.

-- 
Silver

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gaining the trust of online customers is vital for the success of any company
that requires sensitive data to be transmitted over the Web.   Learn how to 
best implement a security strategy that keeps consumers' information secure 
and instills the confidence they need to proceed with transactions.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl 
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users