Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line

2011-01-08 07:06:10
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line
From: Silver Salonen <silver AT ultrasoft DOT ee>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 14:02:55 +0200
On Saturday 08 January 2011 11:46:11 Mister IT Guru wrote:
> On 07/01/2011 14:53, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> > On 07/01/11, Oliver Hoffmann (oh AT dom DOT de) wrote:
> >> I do full backups at the weekend and it just takes too long. 12h or so.
> >> bacula does one job after the other and I have a max. transfer rate of
> >> 11 to 12 MBytes/second due to the 100Mbit connection.
> >>
> >> For testing purpose I connected one client via crosslink (1Gbit on
> >> both sides) to the server. But I still have the same transfer rate. Why
> >> is that?
> > What sort of backups are you doing? Are you writing to tape? Are you
> > using spooling?
> >
> I am new(ish) to bacula, how does spooling speed up jobs, I have noticed 
> similar issues, but because the same behavior appeared on three 
> instances I've built recently. I'm very interested to learn how to 
> improve performance.

Um.. compression?

-- 
Silver

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gaining the trust of online customers is vital for the success of any company
that requires sensitive data to be transmitted over the Web.   Learn how to 
best implement a security strategy that keeps consumers' information secure 
and instills the confidence they need to proceed with transactions.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl 
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users