Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] continuous access backup with bacula

2010-05-14 12:03:00
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] continuous access backup with bacula
From: Josh Fisher <jfisher AT pvct DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 11:59:40 -0400
On 5/14/2010 5:44 AM, Giovanni S. wrote:
> Hi,
> i'm designing a backup continuous access strategy with bacula and i need a
> help.
> I have two bacula server with bacula-dir and bacula-sd, i want do the backup
> on two tape libraries with
>
> autochangers and 48 tapes of 800 GB in each tape library; each bacula-sd can
> see both the tape libraries.
>    

Are you saying there are two server machines? If so, then how do both 
bacula-sd's see both tape libraries? If not, then I don't understand why 
there are two bacula-sd's.

> My requirements are:
> a) i need to backup the same jobs in both the tape libraries
> b) when the primary bacula server and the primary tape library are down, i
> need to execute restore using the other bacula server and the other tape
> library
> c) if a tape of a tape library is corrupt, i change the corrupted tape with
> a new tape and i need to restore the
>
> original contents of the tape using the tape with the same data contained in
> the other tape library
>
> I have seen that there are two solution to copy jobs between tapes:
>
> 1) Using "copy job"
> 2) Using bcopy and bscan
>
> If I use "copy job", I don't know how reach the requirement b and c(because
> i'm not sure that the contents of the tapes are the same)
> If I use "bcopy and bscan", i don't know how implent this solution, i can't
> copy 48 tape of a tape library to the other tape library each day
>
> Can you suggest me some solutions?
> Thanks
>
>
>
>    

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>