ebollengier wrote:
> 
> 
> Graham Keeling wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 08:22:09AM -0700, ebollengier wrote:
>>> I tweaked my test to compare both queries, and it shows no difference
>>> with
>>> and without base job part... If you want to test queries on your side
>>> with
>>> your data, you can download my tool (accurate-test.pl) on
>>> http://bacula.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=bacula/docs;a=tree;f=docs/techlogs;hb=HEAD
>>> 
>>> If you can tweak my script to reproduce your problem, i would be able to
>>> fix
>>> things.
>>> 
>>> http://old.nabble.com/file/p28166612/diff-with-without-basejob.png 
>> 
>> I'm currently running your script to generate the test database. I think
>> that is going to take a long time, so I'll leave it overnight.
>> 
>> 
> 
> This is your first problem, on my server (just a workstation), it takes
> less
> than 10s to add 200,000 records...
> 
> 

In fact, it's 4seconds, here...

JobId=15 files=20000
Insert takes 4secs for 200000 records
JobId=16 files=50000
Insert takes 11secs for 500000 records
JobId=20 files=200000
Insert takes 43secs for 2000000 records
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/VirtualFull-mysql-query-blocks-other-jobs-for-a-long-time-tp28149748p28167844.html
Sent from the Bacula - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users