Five years ago. I am sure Netbackup has progressed in those times. No one likes 
to dish out money to expensive software, but typically sturdy dependable 
products come at a price. Bacula is not a horrible product, but it has bugs in 
it. Bugs any serious company will probably not. In my opinion, it needs to be 
taken out of the open source community, closed sourced, and then have some 
highly paid engineers stamp the bugs.

-----Original Message-----
From: John Drescher [mailto:drescherjm AT gmail DOT com]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:14 PM
To: Steve Handy; bacula-users
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Never Mind - Given up on Bacula

> You get what you pay for!!!!
>
I moved to bacula nearly 5 years ago because veritas had extremely
poor support and used extortion licensing tactics.

Since then, I have backed up 30TB+ with bacula and had very little
problems. That is significantly less than I had with backup executive.
And the support (and documentation) are way better with bacula than
that product.

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users