Jason Dixon-6 wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:56:21AM -0800, ebollengier wrote:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> The batch mode improve the speed with postgresql by a factor of 10 (maybe
>> 20), using
>> a very big job (15M files) with the standard mode won't work too.
> 
> I don't understand what you're saying.  Are you suggesting that either
> way I won't be able to perform this backup due to the number of files?
> 

The backup is possible, but your configuration (hardware and software) needs
to be able to 
do this big insert. For example, if you have only 256MB for ram and 1 poor
old ide drive, it 
will take some time.

I just say that the old "per file" insertion mode will take 10 more time,
and it's already too 
long for you.

With Postgres, you can run your catalog backup at the same time than other
jobs (try to 
avoid having 10 jobs during this job)

Bye
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Hung-on-%22Dir-inserting-attributes%22-tp20450040p20460645.html
Sent from the Bacula - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users