Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] the behaviour of "Rerun Failed Levels"

2008-11-10 21:32:27
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] the behaviour of "Rerun Failed Levels"
From: Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho AT linpro DOT no>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:30:14 +0100
Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org> writes:
> Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
>> I'm considering to turn on "Rerun Failed Levels", but the manual says:
>> 
>>     [...] the Ignore FileSet Changes directive is not considered when
>>     checking for failed levels, which means that any FileSet change
>>     will trigger a rerun.
>> 
>> I don't understand what that means...
>> 
>> let's say that the fileset changed, but that IgnoreFileSetChanges was
>> enabled so that it ran as Incremental as usual.  will that successful
>> Incremental job still be regarded as failed?  or does it mean that a
>> failed Incremental can be considered a failed Full if the fileset had
>> changed?  even if the job wasn't upgraded?
>
> I'm not sure.  Does this thread help?
>
> http://marc.info/?l=bacula-users&m=119027057407116&w=2

thanks, but no, it doesn't mention the interaction with
IgnoreFileSetChanges

-- 
regards,          | Redpill  _
Kjetil T. Homme   | Linpro  (_)


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>