Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] the behaviour of "Rerun Failed Levels"

2008-11-10 20:45:35
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] the behaviour of "Rerun Failed Levels"
From: Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>
To: Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho AT linpro DOT no>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:38:52 -0500
Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
> I'm considering to turn on "Rerun Failed Levels", but the manual says:
> 
>     [...] the Ignore FileSet Changes directive is not considered when
>     checking for failed levels, which means that any FileSet change
>     will trigger a rerun.
> 
> I don't understand what that means...
> 
> let's say that the fileset changed, but that IgnoreFileSetChanges was
> enabled so that it ran as Incremental as usual.  will that successful
> Incremental job still be regarded as failed?  or does it mean that a
> failed Incremental can be considered a failed Full if the fileset had
> changed?  even if the job wasn't upgraded?
> 

I'm not sure.  Does this thread help?

http://marc.info/?l=bacula-users&m=119027057407116&w=2

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>