On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Chris Picton <chris AT ecntelecoms DOT com> 
wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:18:51 +0200, Adrian Moisey wrote:
>
>> If RAID5 is slow and you don't care about redundancy, then I would say
>> RAID0 (or LVM) over the disks.
>
> Just a quick test I ran using
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/store/00/bigfile bs=1M count=8192
> just to get a basic idea of speed:
>
> Raid 5: 8589934592 bytes (8.6 GB) copied, 302.948 seconds, 28.4 MB/s
> Raid 0: 8589934592 bytes (8.6 GB) copied, 27.2641 seconds, 315 MB/s

What is the speed for RADI6 and RAID10???

Thanks,
Lucas

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users