On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Ryan Novosielski <novosirj AT umdnj DOT edu> 
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org> 
>> wrote:
>>> Landon Fuller wrote:
>>>> On Aug 18, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Philipp Geschke wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi List,
>>>>>
>>>>> Can somebody confirm that Ubuntu seriously compiled Bacula in 8.04
>>>>> without TLS after having it enabled in 7.10?
>>>>>
>>>>> Or am I just being dumb?
>>>> Debian upstream disabled it:
>>>>
>>>> README.Debian:
>>>>     bacula (2.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
>>>>
>>>>     * SSL/TLS has been disabled in this version of Bacula due to licensing
>>>>      concerns.  See README.Debian and the thread at
>>>>      http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/07/msg00144.html for more
>>>>      details.
>>>>
>>>> NEWS.Debian
>>>>     Due to licensing concerns (see NEWS.Debian), SSL/TLS is disabled in
>>>> current
>>>>     Debian builds.  This disables both encryption for the on-the-wire
>>>>     protocol as well as encryption of the backed-up data.
>>>>
>>>> Kern specifically allows linking against OpenSSL in the Bacula, and has
>>>> removed any GPL code that can not contain this exception:
>>>>     As a special exception to the GPLv2, the Bacula Project gives
>>>>     permission to link the code of its release of Bacula with the OpenSSL
>>>>     project's "OpenSSL" library (or with modified versions of it that use
>>>>     the same license as the "OpenSSL" library), and distribute the linked
>>>>     executables.  You must obey the GNU General Public License in all
>>>>     respects for all of the code used other than "OpenSSL".
>>>>
>>>> I guess Debian considers the OpenSSL license and the GPL license
>>>> incompatible, and removed support prior to Kern's changes.
>>>> The whole issue is a bit droll.
>>> This is why I like packaging systems which allow you to compile from source.
>>
>> Why don't you recompile it from source then.
>>
>>
>> apt-get build-dep bacula
>> aptitude install libssl-dev openssl
>> aptitude source bacula
>> cd bacula-2....
>> vim debian/rules
>>     # (change the options to enable ssl tls)
>> debian/rules binary
>>    #it should now compile and pack all bacula packages
>> cd ..
>> dpkg -i bacula*.deb
>>
>>
>> Done.
>
> Yes, this is what I was talking about, not getting the source and
> compiling/installing from source alone.
>
> The only issue you may run into here is the distribution's affinity for
> the repository over locally installed packages. I ran into that when
> building tOra with Oracle support. I don't recall how I solved it, but I
> believe there's another step that fixes the changelog so that your
> version is a little newer than the repository but not so new that you
> miss updates.

Well, the commands I sent earlier get the source code of the version
you have installed currently.

So if ubuntu has 2.2.0 the source code for that deb file will be
downloaded. The goal of this is to just recreate the bacula.deb
package with tls support. Not newer code will be downloaded.

Lucas

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users