Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Frank Sweetser ha scritto:
> 
>> It looks like it attempted a traceback, which would have the really useful 
>>  debugging information. Did you by any chance get an email from Bacula which 
>>  contained the traceback? 
> 
> Yes, but quite useless since it had no debug info.
> I recompiled and did it all over again.
> The new traceback is here: http://netfence.it/download/bacula-sd-trace.txt
> 
> I hope this can shed some light; otherwise I'm willing to provide any 
> further info or do any further testing.

I've never been much at debugging C, but all of those zero values look to me
like the stack is completely trashed.

At this point, I'd suggest gathering up your information and opening up a bug
report:

http://bacula.org/en/?page=bugs

-- 
Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu  |  For every problem, there is a solution that
WPI Senior Network Engineer   |  is simple, elegant, and wrong. - HL Mencken
    GPG fingerprint = 6174 1257 129E 0D21 D8D4  E8A3 8E39 29E3 E2E8 8CEC

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users