Hi,
09.07.2008 21:37, Ralf Gross wrote:
> John Drescher schrieb:
>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Hemant Shah <hjrrs AT yahoo DOT com> wrote:
>>> --- On Wed, 7/9/08, Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula says it is doing incremental backup but
>>>> does full backup.
>>>> To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
>>>> Date: Wednesday, July 9, 2008, 5:00 AM
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 14:38:50 -0700
>>>> (PDT), Hemant Shah said:
>>>>> I looked again at the output of the bls commands below
>>>> and I realized that
>>>>> although I specify Incremental backup volume, bls
>>>> lists the files in Full
>>>>> backup volume. The boot strap file is same for all
>>>> disk backups, could this
>>>>> be the problem?
>>>> Can you get a bls listing from the Incremental backup and
>>>> check the stat of a
>>>> few of those files? Your previous stat was from files in
>>>> the Full backup,
>>>> which might not be in the Incremental backup.
>>> Here are the listings for Full and Incremental without specifying bootstrap
>>> file:
>>> The begining of the output was different so I grepped for couple of the
>>> same files from both output so they can be compared:
>>>
>>> [root@lidp11 ~]# bls -c /usr/local/etc/bacula-sd.conf -V
>>> Full-lidp11-2008-07-05-18:14:13 lidp11-File | grep
>>> /mnt/online_docs/src/bind
>>> bls JobId 0: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5021044 2008-07-04 21:18:31
>>> /mnt/online_docs/src/bind/bind-9.2.1.tar.gz
>>> bls JobId 0: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5054652 2008-07-04 21:18:34
>>> /mnt/online_docs/src/bind/bind-9.2.2.tar.gz
>>>
>>> [root@lidp11 ~]# bls -c /usr/local/etc/bacula-sd.conf -V
>>> Incr-lidp11-2008-07-06-22:05:25 lidp11-File | grep
>>> /mnt/online_docs/src/bind
>>> bls JobId 0: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5021044 2008-07-06 14:00:44
>>> /mnt/online_docs/src/bind/bind-9.2.1.tar.gz
>>> bls JobId 0: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5054652 2008-07-06 14:00:45
>>> /mnt/online_docs/src/bind/bind-9.2.2.tar.gz
>>>
>>> These files have not been changed in several years:
>>>
>> Can someone point out what the times associated with these files are?
>> Time of backup??
>
> http://www.bacula.org/en/dev-manual/Volume_Utility_Tools.html#SECTION003950000000000000000
> | Normally if no options are specified, bls will produce the
> | equivalent output to the ls -l command for each file on the tape.
>
> Hm, looks strange... This is the time bacula thinks the file was
> changed. I've just looked at one of my volumes with bls and it shows
> the correct time.
Yup... this looks like it's bug report time... it seems that, while
backing up, Bacula somehow picks the wrong timestamp. Funny.
Arno
> Ralf
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
> Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
> along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
> and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
--
Arno Lehmann
IT-Service Lehmann
www.its-lehmann.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
