Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape status full not correct?

2008-06-27 10:08:57
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Tape status full not correct?
From: "John Drescher" <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
To: "Felix Brack" <fb AT ltec DOT ch>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:08:46 -0400
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Felix Brack <fb AT ltec DOT ch> wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
>>> dmesg reports this:
>>>
>>> st0: MTSETDRVBUFFER only allowed for root
>>>
>>> Might this be the root of all evil?
>>
>> It is possible but I am not sure. I did a quick google search and got
>> quite a few hits but the first few did not point to any problems
>> caused by this error. They did point to one question though. Does what
>> ever user that the bacula-sd runs under have rwx permissions?
>
> I did already google for this MTSETDRVBUFFER 'problem' but it did not
> help. Due to some other reason I currently run bacula-sd as user root
> and group tape, so this should not be the problem.
>
> What do you mean by 'rwx permissions'? The permissions on the device
> (/dev/st0 or /dev/nst0)? If so they are both set to rw-, execution bit
> on these files is not set; I think that's correct, isn't it?
>>
Probably is. Sorry. I am not at work today and I was got that from a
google search for that error...

John

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users