Re: [Bacula-users] Tape status full not correct?
2008-06-27 09:11:55
John Drescher wrote:
>> dmesg reports this:
>>
>> st0: MTSETDRVBUFFER only allowed for root
>>
>> Might this be the root of all evil?
>
> It is possible but I am not sure. I did a quick google search and got
> quite a few hits but the first few did not point to any problems
> caused by this error. They did point to one question though. Does what
> ever user that the bacula-sd runs under have rwx permissions?
I did already google for this MTSETDRVBUFFER 'problem' but it did not
help. Due to some other reason I currently run bacula-sd as user root
and group tape, so this should not be the problem.
What do you mean by 'rwx permissions'? The permissions on the device
(/dev/st0 or /dev/nst0)? If so they are both set to rw-, execution bit
on these files is not set; I think that's correct, isn't it?
>
>> Bacula shows no append errors. I
>> suppose by 'btape tests' you mean the tests in bacula manual chapter 37,
>> 'Testing Your Tape Drive With Bacula'; yes, I did run these tests.
>> Probably I should rerun them and note the results?
>>
> You may want to try this test as the bacula user or (whatever user
> runs the bacula-sd).
>
> John
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
|
|