On Apr 25, 2008, at 6:02 AM, Alan Brown wrote:

> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Dan Langille wrote:
>
>>> Last night I ran the backup cycle, bacula did the full backup and  
>>> immediately tried to do the incremental backup. Instead of doing  
>>> incremental backup it upgraded it to a full backup. Why did it  
>>> upgrade to a full backup if full backup was done right before it  
>>> started incremental?
>>
>> The upgrade to FULL is done at the time the job is put into the  
>> queue.
>> At that time there was no FULL backup.
>
> IMHO this is a bug.

It is a design choice.

> The status check should be done when the job exits the queue and  
> starts
> up, not when it's placed on the queue.

Patches welcome to [optionally] change that behaviour.

-- 
Dan Langille -- http://www.langille.org/
dan AT langille DOT org





-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users