Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Incremental upgraded to full?

2008-04-25 06:04:08
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Incremental upgraded to full?
From: Alan Brown <ajb2 AT mssl.ucl.ac DOT uk>
To: Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:02:35 +0100 (BST)
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Dan Langille wrote:

> > Last night I ran the backup cycle, bacula did the full backup and 
> > immediately tried to do the incremental backup. Instead of doing 
> > incremental backup it upgraded it to a full backup. Why did it upgrade to a 
> > full backup if full backup was done right before it started incremental?
>
> The upgrade to FULL is done at the time the job is put into the queue.
> At that time there was no FULL backup.

IMHO this is a bug.

The status check should be done when the job exits the queue and starts
up, not when it's placed on the queue.

AB


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users